<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Kulturblog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kulturblog.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kulturblog.com</link>
	<description>A pop culture blog by Mormons but not about Mormonism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 21:34:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When bands become their own tribute bands by a37rj2</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2013/04/02/when-bands-become-their-own-tribute-bands/#comment-58883</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[a37rj2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 21:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kulturblog.com/?p=7377#comment-58883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tate&#039;s project really isn&#039;t even a band. They just put out the filth so he can fight for the band name and/or slander the other Queensryche by creating market confusion. Tate knows he can settle with the band in the lawsuit so he goes by this tactic. At the same time the Queensryche corporation including other original lineup members pickup the tab for his touring expenses and production costs. Plus they get a cut from Tate&#039;s revenue and vice versa with whatever revenue the Latorre Queensryche album makes. Very confusing but you know its the short end of it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tate&#8217;s project really isn&#8217;t even a band. They just put out the filth so he can fight for the band name and/or slander the other Queensryche by creating market confusion. Tate knows he can settle with the band in the lawsuit so he goes by this tactic. At the same time the Queensryche corporation including other original lineup members pickup the tab for his touring expenses and production costs. Plus they get a cut from Tate&#8217;s revenue and vice versa with whatever revenue the Latorre Queensryche album makes. Very confusing but you know its the short end of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top Five songs with a fiddle by Jacob</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2010/09/13/top-five-songs-with-a-fiddle/#comment-58450</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 05:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kulturblog.com/?p=3628#comment-58450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dude seriously listen to mountain heart and Jim vancleve. You won&#039;t be disappointed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude seriously listen to mountain heart and Jim vancleve. You won&#8217;t be disappointed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Great Song Beginnings by del</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2009/01/27/great-song-beginnings/#comment-58010</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[del]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 02:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kulturblog.com/?p=1865#comment-58010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Immigrant song  Zeplin
Baba O&#039;Reily
For What it&#039;s worth]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Immigrant song  Zeplin<br />
Baba O&#8217;Reily<br />
For What it&#8217;s worth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New York City &#8211; an itinerary for 5 days/4 nights by twitter followers</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2009/08/18/new-york-city-an-itinerary-for-5-days4-night/#comment-57985</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[twitter followers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 00:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kulturblog.com/?p=2111#comment-57985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I usually do not leave many responses, but i 
did some searching and wound up here New York City - an itinerary for 5 days/4 nights &#124; Kulturblog.
And I do have 2 questions for you if you tend not to mind.

Could it be just me or does it look like some of the responses look like coming from brain dead individuals?
:-P And, if you are writing at other sites, I would like to keep up with everything fresh you have to post.
Would you make a list of every one of all your public pages like your linkedin profile,
Facebook page or twitter feed?.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I usually do not leave many responses, but i<br />
did some searching and wound up here New York City &#8211; an itinerary for 5 days/4 nights | Kulturblog.<br />
And I do have 2 questions for you if you tend not to mind.</p>
<p>Could it be just me or does it look like some of the responses look like coming from brain dead individuals? <img src='http://s2.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' />  And, if you are writing at other sites, I would like to keep up with everything fresh you have to post.<br />
Would you make a list of every one of all your public pages like your linkedin profile,<br />
Facebook page or twitter feed?.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Justified Season 4, The Americans by Ben</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2013/03/19/justified-season-4-the-americans/#comment-57953</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 22:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kulturblog.com/?p=7366#comment-57953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve enjoyed The Americans. Anyone been watching Orphan Black? Pretty gripping as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve enjoyed The Americans. Anyone been watching Orphan Black? Pretty gripping as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Music: 80s Edition by MCQ</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2013/05/14/new-music-80s-edition/#comment-57735</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MCQ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kulturblog.com/?p=7439#comment-57735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They have both been writing and recording new music lately, so it&#039;s not just an old age tribute band thing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have both been writing and recording new music lately, so it&#8217;s not just an old age tribute band thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Music: 80s Edition by MCQ</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2013/05/14/new-music-80s-edition/#comment-57734</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MCQ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kulturblog.com/?p=7439#comment-57734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently, these bands have both been working pretty steadily, Depeche a little moreso than OMD, who broke up for about a decade from 1996-2006 to work on other projects.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently, these bands have both been working pretty steadily, Depeche a little moreso than OMD, who broke up for about a decade from 1996-2006 to work on other projects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Music: 80s Edition by Clark</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2013/05/14/new-music-80s-edition/#comment-57699</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 19:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kulturblog.com/?p=7439#comment-57699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whenever I see bands like this are still around I&#039;m surprised. I then start wondering, have they been doing this full time the past 30 years? Did they wisely invest the money they made at their peak and have been living off this? Or did they end up with interesting other jobs like Thomas Dolby did briefly. (He apparently invented one of the early cellular phone compression codes) When they get back into music are they doing basically the &quot;old age tribute band&quot; bit, trying to recapture past glory or just having fun?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whenever I see bands like this are still around I&#8217;m surprised. I then start wondering, have they been doing this full time the past 30 years? Did they wisely invest the money they made at their peak and have been living off this? Or did they end up with interesting other jobs like Thomas Dolby did briefly. (He apparently invented one of the early cellular phone compression codes) When they get back into music are they doing basically the &#8220;old age tribute band&#8221; bit, trying to recapture past glory or just having fun?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Greatest of the Great Gatsby by MCQ</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2013/04/25/the-greatest-of-the-great-gatsby/#comment-57534</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MCQ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 04:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kulturblog.com/?p=7389#comment-57534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just saw the movie.  It was a home run in my opinion.  Well acted, great music, wonderfully filmed, visually stunning, and true to the spirit and words of the novel.  I&#039;m surprised that all the critics weren&#039;t impressed, but it seems to me that all the smart ones got it.  I want to see it again, and it&#039;s definitely a movie I will be glad to own and watch repeatedly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just saw the movie.  It was a home run in my opinion.  Well acted, great music, wonderfully filmed, visually stunning, and true to the spirit and words of the novel.  I&#8217;m surprised that all the critics weren&#8217;t impressed, but it seems to me that all the smart ones got it.  I want to see it again, and it&#8217;s definitely a movie I will be glad to own and watch repeatedly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Greatest of the Great Gatsby by MCQ</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2013/04/25/the-greatest-of-the-great-gatsby/#comment-57166</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MCQ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 20:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kulturblog.com/?p=7389#comment-57166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a good article, wonderdog, and a well argued thesis.  It&#039;s certainly correct in many ways, especially in its general conclusions, but I don&#039;t think it&#039;s right about Gatsby, ultimately, because of this statement:

&quot;It was for himself. What Gatsby loves is a dream of a world, one where he is king, the chosen one, the best—and one that, incidentally and perhaps accidentally, includes Daisy.&quot;

It&#039;s true that Gatsby dreamed up Jay Gatsby, the name and the idea of a wealthy man that was different from who he was as a child, before he ever met Daisy, but he was still poor and penniless when he met her.  He was never able to do anything to make his dream real until she became part of it.  The motivating force of it.  Remember that this is his view of Daisy:

&quot;His heart beat faster and faster as Daisy’s white face came up to his own. He knew that when he kissed this girl, and forever wed his unutterable visions to her perishable breath, his mind would never romp again like the mind of God. So he waited, listening for a moment longer to the tuning fork that had been struck upon a star. Then he kissed her. At his lips’ touch she blossomed for him like a flower and the incarnation was complete.&quot;

He was ready to give up everything for her.  If he could be poor and get Daisy, he would be poor.  But he believed he needed to be rich.  Tom was rich and got Daisy, so Gatsby thought he needed to be more rich than Tom to get her back.  Daisy wasn&#039;t incidental to Gatsby&#039;s dream, she was the dream.  That&#039;s why, when he lost her again, his dream collapsed:

&quot;he must have felt that he had lost the old warm world, paid a high price for living too long with a single dream. He must have looked up at an unfamiliar sky through frightening leaves and shivered as he found what a grotesque thing a rose is and how raw the sunlight was upon the scarcely created grass. A new world, material without being real, where poor ghosts, breathing dreams like air, drifted fortuitously about … like that ashen, fantastic figure gliding toward him through the amorphous trees.&quot;

The article overstates its case in regard to Don Draper too.  The reason that Don can&#039;t be satisfied with his wives isn&#039;t because they don&#039;t know who he is.  He told his wives everything.  His first wife was revolted by his lies and divorced him but his second wife knew the truth before they got married, and still chose to love him and marry him. 

There is something connecting Don Draper and Jay Gatsby, and the article has a good point, but it&#039;s applcability to these stories is flawed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a good article, wonderdog, and a well argued thesis.  It&#8217;s certainly correct in many ways, especially in its general conclusions, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s right about Gatsby, ultimately, because of this statement:</p>
<p>&#8220;It was for himself. What Gatsby loves is a dream of a world, one where he is king, the chosen one, the best—and one that, incidentally and perhaps accidentally, includes Daisy.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s true that Gatsby dreamed up Jay Gatsby, the name and the idea of a wealthy man that was different from who he was as a child, before he ever met Daisy, but he was still poor and penniless when he met her.  He was never able to do anything to make his dream real until she became part of it.  The motivating force of it.  Remember that this is his view of Daisy:</p>
<p>&#8220;His heart beat faster and faster as Daisy’s white face came up to his own. He knew that when he kissed this girl, and forever wed his unutterable visions to her perishable breath, his mind would never romp again like the mind of God. So he waited, listening for a moment longer to the tuning fork that had been struck upon a star. Then he kissed her. At his lips’ touch she blossomed for him like a flower and the incarnation was complete.&#8221;</p>
<p>He was ready to give up everything for her.  If he could be poor and get Daisy, he would be poor.  But he believed he needed to be rich.  Tom was rich and got Daisy, so Gatsby thought he needed to be more rich than Tom to get her back.  Daisy wasn&#8217;t incidental to Gatsby&#8217;s dream, she was the dream.  That&#8217;s why, when he lost her again, his dream collapsed:</p>
<p>&#8220;he must have felt that he had lost the old warm world, paid a high price for living too long with a single dream. He must have looked up at an unfamiliar sky through frightening leaves and shivered as he found what a grotesque thing a rose is and how raw the sunlight was upon the scarcely created grass. A new world, material without being real, where poor ghosts, breathing dreams like air, drifted fortuitously about … like that ashen, fantastic figure gliding toward him through the amorphous trees.&#8221;</p>
<p>The article overstates its case in regard to Don Draper too.  The reason that Don can&#8217;t be satisfied with his wives isn&#8217;t because they don&#8217;t know who he is.  He told his wives everything.  His first wife was revolted by his lies and divorced him but his second wife knew the truth before they got married, and still chose to love him and marry him. </p>
<p>There is something connecting Don Draper and Jay Gatsby, and the article has a good point, but it&#8217;s applcability to these stories is flawed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>