Review: The Six Degrees of Helter Skelter

To a certain-“that’s an interesting story”-extent, I have always been intrigued by serial killers. Not in a creepy-avid-fandom sense, but rather from the perspective of psychological curiosity. I have always felt the need to somehow understand society’s monsters; to find some rationality in their chaos of thought and action. From a reflective standpoint, one might assume that I somehow seek to understand the irrational and illogical in an attempt to feel at ease. Maybe by deciphering the enigma of the modern maniac, I can in some way seek ‘the pattern’…’the purpose’. Which I suppose is true. In my mind, I just feel that everything can be boiled down to a core – a central spark of principle. By seeking to dismantle the carnage and context, I feel that I can, in some way, ‘get’ these people. And in turn I feel safer; I feel that I can protect myself and my family from the crippling irrationality of fear and confusion. Or maybe I’m just like everyone else, and carry a warped fascination with gore. Regardless of this, I recently stumbled upon a documentary which I feel maintains a similar purpose as my own; to deconstruct the mind of evil.
History is littered with shocking tales of individuals who do the unthinkable, but serial killers have always been a particular focus of media frenzy. There are numerous names and faces that we all recognise; images and sounds burned into the psyche of modern society. But despite the fever pitch surrounding each ghoulish individual, there seems to be certain divisions within the notoriety. Anyone with at least a remote interest will be familiar with names such as Peter Sutcliff, Ed Gein, Mary Ann Cotton and David Berkowitz. There are regional names, ones which ring out in certain countries and send a shudder through generations; names such as Javed Iqbal, Miyuki Ishikawa, Harold Shipman and Myra Hindley. Then there are the big ones, names so infamous that they are recognised almost anywhere in the world. Ted Bundy, The Wests, Jack the Ripper and Charles Manson are amongst the names on that select list. Manson is technically not a serial killer, but rather a cult leader. He may have more in league with the likes of Jim Jones, but many still see him as something other than just ‘another crazy cult guy’. As a man responsible for the seemingly random and horrific deaths of ‘regular’ people, Manson is arguably one of the most chilling identities in the killer alumni…and if you didn’t think so before, you will once you’ve seen The Six Degrees of Helter Skelter.

Michael Dorsey’s little seen documentary is a wonderfully researched low budget exploration of the events surrounding the Tate/LaBianca murders. Host and ‘death enthusiast’ Scott Michaels takes a camera crew on a blood trail through 40 plus locations linked to Charles Manson and the Manson Family. The film is inaccessible at first. Michaels’ narration is delivered at 100mph, and he throws names around with the supposition of a man who obviously expects a certain level of prior knowledge from his viewers. The tacky visual aids and dodgy sound editing screams of a man with little or no ability to engage with his medium, this is truly a project made to educate rather than entertain. Whether consciously or unconsciously, as a modern audience we expect a certain beat or rhythm from filmmakers – but director Dorsey is clearly tone deaf (as a metaphor, think Steve Martin dancing in The Jerk). Visual aids, voice over work and sound seem to fall independent of each other, leaving the viewer with a sense that the disc may be scratched or damaged. On more than one occasion, Michaels will be talking about a particular person and place, whilst Dorsey chooses to present us with an image of something completely different. The whole project feels uncouth and untrained. Yet, somewhere along the way you become too immersed in the story, too engrossed in Michaels’ sheer depth of knowledge, to be distracted by the poor film quality.
Scott Michaels is the founder of L.A based tour company, Dearly Departed Tours. Slightly neurotic and outwardly nerdy, Michaels is as endearing as he is informed about the film’s topic. He makes no qualms in advertising the emotional connection he shares with the Manson saga. Michaels is very candid about his unusual obsession with the dead (in particular, dead celebrities), and brazenly plugs his tours, books and that of his friends. But this is all by the by, because when Michaels gets into the nitty-gritty of the story, it is very clear that he is not just ‘knowledgeable’ about the Manson story – he is engrossed by it. He takes the time, albeit in between short sharp breaths, to impart every conceivable detail on Manson. This is not a study of the Manson Family, nor is it a paint-by-numbers detailing of events – it is that rare gem, a little of both.

Make no mistake; The Six Degrees of Helter Skelter is not a Manson documentary. It is a visual essay of the events leading up to, and surrounding, the Tate/LaBianca murders. It is a film about the victims and the places it happened – its forensic history…with a dash of geek zeal. Michaels presents his theories about Manson, and challenges the theories of others, but all of this is done in a very informal and non-academic way. Neither Michaels nor Dorsey are able to offer an all-access-pass to every location, and peripheral historical/cultural context is sidelined, probably due to gaps in knowledge. But the overall project is surprisingly engaging and informative, leaving you with a sense of information overload and emotional disturbance. The Six Degrees of Helter Skelter takes you on a journey, one much more jarring than any modern horror movie. It may be ugly and uncomfortable at times, but so is the subject matter.

The Six Degrees of Helter Skelter is available now to rent and buy on DVD
Posted on March 5, 2012, in DVD, Movies. Bookmark the permalink. 11 Comments.

Brad, nice review. My ignorance in this area is staggering. I know the names but I unfortunately have very little sense for what exactly Manson is famous for, aside from the fact that people died. However, with that said, this seems like a film that just would not work for a novice like me, would you agree?
Im not sure actually. Adele had very little knowledge of it, yet she found the film to be quite accessible.
Sounds interesting, and disturbing.
I’m the same way you are about serial killers (what you say in your opening paragraph applies to me too). I’ve read a lot of John Douglas’s books to try to understand what causes people to go so far off the deep end. Have you ever read any of his stuff?
Also, another comment that has nothing to do with this documentary–my son is really into a band right now called Macabre. All they write about is serial killers. In fact they have an entire album about Jeffrey Dahmer. I think they’re music is called “murder metal.” It reminds me of Suicidal Tendencies back in the 80s (shock punk).
btw, the red-eyes in the poster made me laugh. As if he need red-eyes to make him seem evil!
Aaron, it totally sums up the tacky nature of the film. But i guess someone felt it necessary….just to, you know, emphasis his evil soul. Haha.
Susan, i have not read any of Douglas’ work. Would you say he is worth looking up?
This is a particularly interesting story because he’s still alive and a lot of his followers are doing there best to live normal lives. There are still some mysteries involving who they may have killed (including one of their attorneys). Some of his former followers have disappeared (probably changed their names and are now trying to lead normal lives).
Does the film address any of these unsolved questions?
The film touches very briefly on the ambiguous nature of just how many victims there are, and the fact that only a handful were ever caught and prosecuted gets a minute or two. But mainly its all about Tate and LaBianca and the locations it all happened (there is also a small segment about Spahn Ranch and the Donald Shea murder). He also visits the lodge in Death Valley where Manson was arrested…that is a pretty creepy place.
I’ve heard about that place in Death Valley. Death Valley is a really interesting place, I’d love to go to that spot. I think.
John Douglas is one of the guys who basically invented FBI profiling. The character of Starling’s mentor in Silence of the Lambs is based on him. His books are really interesting and give a lot of insight into serial killers. Here’s his website:
http://www.johndouglasmindhunter.com/home.php
I read the first two of John Douglas’s books and found them really fascinating.
I remember when I was in junior high I tried to read the book Helter Skelter and couldn’t sleep at night. It’s one of only two books that freaked me out so much I never finished them.
The scariest part of the story to me was the fact that the Manson family used to sneak into strangers homes at nights, for fun and for practice. I just couldnt’ stop thinking about that when I was young.
I think the reason Manson occupies such a huge place in the popular imagination, and the serial killer pantheon, if you will, is because his crimes were more or less the death knell of the 60s, free love, hippies, etc. It revealed an extremely darkside to the 60s counter-culture. Not to mention the fact that the Hollywood location and nature of the victims makes it extra intriguing.
I always feel bad for the young teenage guy who went over to visit a friend in the guest house to borrow some stereo equipment and ended up getting killed. Talk about the wrong place at the wrong time.
Also, for those who are interested in serial killers I recommend a film called Appropriate Adult staring Dominic West and Emily Watson. It’s about the Wests, a deeply disturbing case. What’s great about it, is it de-mythologizes a lot of the Hollywood mystique that surrounds serial killers, and presents the grim reality.
Appropriate Adult was very good. I found that it took a character such as Fred West and painted a 3-dimensional image rather than simple monster or hammy ‘mistaken’ soul. That scene where he is walking around the garden and cannot remember where the body is buried was outstanding.