<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Watchmen!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kulturblog.com/2009/03/08/the-watchmen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kulturblog.com/2009/03/08/the-watchmen/</link>
	<description>A pop culture blog by Mormons but not about Mormonism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 22:26:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BTD Greg</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2009/03/08/the-watchmen/#comment-2238</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BTD Greg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 01:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kulturblog.com/?p=1908#comment-2238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Iâ€™m not. Itâ€™s been a long time since a good kids movie was out and a lot of people have fond memories for the original. (Although I hear the remake sucks)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Go back and watch the originals sometime (or don&#039;t).  They are terrible.  I had fond memories, too.  When I rewatched with my kids, I thought, &quot;This?  This is the movie I liked?  Really?&quot;  Truly awful.  If the new one&#039;s as bad as it looks, then at least it&#039;s not out of line with the franchise.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Iâ€™m not. Itâ€™s been a long time since a good kids movie was out and a lot of people have fond memories for the original. (Although I hear the remake sucks)</p></blockquote>
<p>Go back and watch the originals sometime (or don&#8217;t).  They are terrible.  I had fond memories, too.  When I rewatched with my kids, I thought, &#8220;This?  This is the movie I liked?  Really?&#8221;  Truly awful.  If the new one&#8217;s as bad as it looks, then at least it&#8217;s not out of line with the franchise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clark</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2009/03/08/the-watchmen/#comment-2237</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[clark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 20:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kulturblog.com/?p=1908#comment-2237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not.  It&#039;s been a long time since a good kids movie was out and a lot of people have fond memories for the original.  (Although I hear the remake sucks)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not.  It&#8217;s been a long time since a good kids movie was out and a lot of people have fond memories for the original.  (Although I hear the remake sucks)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt W.</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2009/03/08/the-watchmen/#comment-2236</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt W.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 20:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kulturblog.com/?p=1908#comment-2236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ouch, Race to Witch Mountain beat Watchmen this weekend. Totally surprised by that...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ouch, Race to Witch Mountain beat Watchmen this weekend. Totally surprised by that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian G</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2009/03/08/the-watchmen/#comment-2235</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian G]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 02:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kulturblog.com/?p=1908#comment-2235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I felt the movie was disappointing because it was too faithful to the source material (which is slightly overrated to begin with).  By the last act it begins to plod precisely when it should ramp up.  And the acting was really uneven.  Jackie Earle Haley was great as Rorschach.  In fact, for most of the movie I was wishing I was watching RORSCHACH: THE MOVIE, not WATCHMEN.  Nite Owl and the Comedian were also solid, but Silk Spectre?  Don&#039;t get me started.  I think she was cast almost entirely for her looks.

And although I&#039;ve seen great stuff from Billy Crudup in other films I don&#039;t think he pulled off Dr. Manhattan.  While the comic gives you a tragic sense of a man on the verge of happiness that is accidentally wrenched into an existence where he&#039;s helplessly distanced from humanity, the film just gives you a cold, emotionless, uncaring god.  This proved to be a key difference in making the story work.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I felt the movie was disappointing because it was too faithful to the source material (which is slightly overrated to begin with).  By the last act it begins to plod precisely when it should ramp up.  And the acting was really uneven.  Jackie Earle Haley was great as Rorschach.  In fact, for most of the movie I was wishing I was watching RORSCHACH: THE MOVIE, not WATCHMEN.  Nite Owl and the Comedian were also solid, but Silk Spectre?  Don&#8217;t get me started.  I think she was cast almost entirely for her looks.</p>
<p>And although I&#8217;ve seen great stuff from Billy Crudup in other films I don&#8217;t think he pulled off Dr. Manhattan.  While the comic gives you a tragic sense of a man on the verge of happiness that is accidentally wrenched into an existence where he&#8217;s helplessly distanced from humanity, the film just gives you a cold, emotionless, uncaring god.  This proved to be a key difference in making the story work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danithew</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2009/03/08/the-watchmen/#comment-2234</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[danithew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 14:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kulturblog.com/?p=1908#comment-2234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the Watchmen comics provide a very complex story - but it&#039;s quite brutal and depressing in its conclusions about human beings.  Definitely interesting/intriguing for a comic books fan but at the end of the story I&#039;m wondering if the conclusion/end is really all that helpful or illuminating.  But maybe that was never the point ... (?)



(shrugs)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the Watchmen comics provide a very complex story &#8211; but it&#8217;s quite brutal and depressing in its conclusions about human beings.  Definitely interesting/intriguing for a comic books fan but at the end of the story I&#8217;m wondering if the conclusion/end is really all that helpful or illuminating.  But maybe that was never the point &#8230; (?)</p>
<p>(shrugs)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BTD Greg</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2009/03/08/the-watchmen/#comment-2233</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BTD Greg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 13:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kulturblog.com/?p=1908#comment-2233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slate.com/id/2212953/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This one&lt;/a&gt; from Slate is worth checking out too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2212953/" rel="nofollow">This one</a> from Slate is worth checking out too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MCQ</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2009/03/08/the-watchmen/#comment-2232</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MCQ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 13:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kulturblog.com/?p=1908#comment-2232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, ok. I get it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, ok. I get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BTD Greg</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2009/03/08/the-watchmen/#comment-2231</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BTD Greg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 13:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kulturblog.com/?p=1908#comment-2231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Youâ€™re right, I havenâ€™t read it (if thatâ€™s the right word for a comic book), but Iâ€™m talking about the quality of this cartoon. It looks like itâ€™s just badly drawn and the music is just plain terrible.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah, it&#039;s supposed to look terrible.  It&#039;s fake.  The premise behind this cartoon is: what if the Watchmen, this incredibly complex and adult comic was turned into the worst kind of Saturday morning cartoon?  To someone who&#039;s read the book, the cartoon has some utterly ridiculous in-jokes (I&#039;ll refrain from telling more because it would involve spoilers).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Youâ€™re right, I havenâ€™t read it (if thatâ€™s the right word for a comic book), but Iâ€™m talking about the quality of this cartoon. It looks like itâ€™s just badly drawn and the music is just plain terrible.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, it&#8217;s supposed to look terrible.  It&#8217;s fake.  The premise behind this cartoon is: what if the Watchmen, this incredibly complex and adult comic was turned into the worst kind of Saturday morning cartoon?  To someone who&#8217;s read the book, the cartoon has some utterly ridiculous in-jokes (I&#8217;ll refrain from telling more because it would involve spoilers).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hayes</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2009/03/08/the-watchmen/#comment-2230</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hayes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 07:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kulturblog.com/?p=1908#comment-2230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read two articles from Ebert, who was a Watchmen virgin, as it were.   

First crack:  
http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090304/REVIEWS/903049997 
&lt;blockquote&gt;After the revelation of â€œThe Dark Knight,â€ here is â€œWatchmen,â€ another bold exercise in the liberation of the superhero movie. Itâ€™s a compelling visceral film â€” sound, images and characters combined into a decidedly odd visual experience that evokes the feel of a graphic novel.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;The film is rich enough to be seen more than once. I plan to see it again, this time on IMAX, and will have more to say about it. Iâ€™m not sure I understood all the nuances and implications, but I am sure I had a powerful experience. Itâ€™s not as entertaining as â€œThe Dark Knight,â€ but like the â€œMatrixâ€ films, LOTR and â€œThe Dark Knight,â€ itâ€™s going to inspire fevered analysis. I donâ€™t want to see it twice for that reason, however, but mostly just to have the experience again.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Second time (saw it on an iMax)
http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2009/03/were_all_puppets_laurie_im_jus.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read two articles from Ebert, who was a Watchmen virgin, as it were.   </p>
<p>First crack:<br />
<a href="http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090304/REVIEWS/903049997" rel="nofollow">http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090304/REVIEWS/903049997</a> </p>
<blockquote><p>After the revelation of â€œThe Dark Knight,â€ here is â€œWatchmen,â€ another bold exercise in the liberation of the superhero movie. Itâ€™s a compelling visceral film â€” sound, images and characters combined into a decidedly odd visual experience that evokes the feel of a graphic novel.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>The film is rich enough to be seen more than once. I plan to see it again, this time on IMAX, and will have more to say about it. Iâ€™m not sure I understood all the nuances and implications, but I am sure I had a powerful experience. Itâ€™s not as entertaining as â€œThe Dark Knight,â€ but like the â€œMatrixâ€ films, LOTR and â€œThe Dark Knight,â€ itâ€™s going to inspire fevered analysis. I donâ€™t want to see it twice for that reason, however, but mostly just to have the experience again.</p></blockquote>
<p>Second time (saw it on an iMax)<br />
<a href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2009/03/were_all_puppets_laurie_im_jus.html" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2009/03/were_all_puppets_laurie_im_jus.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MCQ</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2009/03/08/the-watchmen/#comment-2229</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MCQ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 06:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kulturblog.com/?p=1908#comment-2229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re right, I haven&#039;t read it (if that&#039;s the right word for a comic book), but I&#039;m talking about the quality of this cartoon.  It looks like it&#039;s just badly drawn and the music is just plain terrible.  Parody or not, isn&#039;t there some level of quality you hope for?  This just looks plain poor.  Maybe I just don&#039;t get it.  I was planning on seeing the movie, but the mixed reviews have put me off a bit.  Is it worth seeing if you aren&#039;t already a fan of the comic book?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, I haven&#8217;t read it (if that&#8217;s the right word for a comic book), but I&#8217;m talking about the quality of this cartoon.  It looks like it&#8217;s just badly drawn and the music is just plain terrible.  Parody or not, isn&#8217;t there some level of quality you hope for?  This just looks plain poor.  Maybe I just don&#8217;t get it.  I was planning on seeing the movie, but the mixed reviews have put me off a bit.  Is it worth seeing if you aren&#8217;t already a fan of the comic book?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

