<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tom Hanks or Harrison Ford?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kulturblog.com/2008/08/18/tom-hanks-or-harrison-ford/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kulturblog.com/2008/08/18/tom-hanks-or-harrison-ford/</link>
	<description>A pop culture blog by Mormons but not about Mormonism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 14:16:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clark</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2008/08/18/tom-hanks-or-harrison-ford/#comment-20825</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kulturblog.com/?p=1708#comment-20825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I bet the person who said that was blonde!  (Just kidding, I was until around 30 fairly blonde although my hair&#039;s been getting darker the older I get)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet the person who said that was blonde!  (Just kidding, I was until around 30 fairly blonde although my hair&#8217;s been getting darker the older I get)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrianJ</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2008/08/18/tom-hanks-or-harrison-ford/#comment-20824</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BrianJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 02:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kulturblog.com/?p=1708#comment-20824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[C&#039;mon: &quot;I really liked Ford&#039;s character in the movie &lt;i&gt;Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom.&lt;/i&gt; I can&#039;t seem to remember the character&#039;s name though.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C&#8217;mon: &#8220;I really liked Ford&#8217;s character in the movie <i>Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom.</i> I can&#8217;t seem to remember the character&#8217;s name though.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clark</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2008/08/18/tom-hanks-or-harrison-ford/#comment-20823</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 01:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kulturblog.com/?p=1708#comment-20823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brian.  Sure it&#039;s fair.  Ford was in them. Hanks wasn&#039;t.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian.  Sure it&#8217;s fair.  Ford was in them. Hanks wasn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrianJ</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2008/08/18/tom-hanks-or-harrison-ford/#comment-20822</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BrianJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kulturblog.com/?p=1708#comment-20822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clark, you can&#039;t really compare the memorability of characters in Ford&#039;s trilogies versus Hanks&#039; one-shot movies. Who could watch a trilogy and not come away knowing the main characters&#039; names?

I will concede that Ford has a definite edge when it comes to action. I&#039;m just giving comedy more weight than action, and Hanks clearly wins there. That&#039;s surely just a difference of opinion between us.

And there were parts of Gump I really liked, including the whole concept. But after an hour I just needed that movie to stop (see &quot;Titanic&quot;). 

Summer, Abby: As for Connery: it&#039;s not even fair. The guy could say &quot;I have bunions on my feet&quot; and women would find it sexy and guys would think it sounded cool. Connery is voice---compare him with James Earl Jones or Morgan Freeman.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clark, you can&#8217;t really compare the memorability of characters in Ford&#8217;s trilogies versus Hanks&#8217; one-shot movies. Who could watch a trilogy and not come away knowing the main characters&#8217; names?</p>
<p>I will concede that Ford has a definite edge when it comes to action. I&#8217;m just giving comedy more weight than action, and Hanks clearly wins there. That&#8217;s surely just a difference of opinion between us.</p>
<p>And there were parts of Gump I really liked, including the whole concept. But after an hour I just needed that movie to stop (see &#8220;Titanic&#8221;). </p>
<p>Summer, Abby: As for Connery: it&#8217;s not even fair. The guy could say &#8220;I have bunions on my feet&#8221; and women would find it sexy and guys would think it sounded cool. Connery is voice&#8212;compare him with James Earl Jones or Morgan Freeman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clark</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2008/08/18/tom-hanks-or-harrison-ford/#comment-20821</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kulturblog.com/?p=1708#comment-20821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The prequel is his next film up on the queue for next year.  I read a few pages at the bookstore and it was even worse written.  We&#039;re talking Robin Cook level of badness.

But yeah, he looked pretty creepy with that mullet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The prequel is his next film up on the queue for next year.  I read a few pages at the bookstore and it was even worse written.  We&#8217;re talking Robin Cook level of badness.</p>
<p>But yeah, he looked pretty creepy with that mullet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Supergenius</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2008/08/18/tom-hanks-or-harrison-ford/#comment-20820</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Supergenius]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 23:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kulturblog.com/?p=1708#comment-20820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just can&#039;t get over Hanks&#039; immensely creepy long hair in The Davinci Code.  What a miserable train wreck of a movie.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just can&#8217;t get over Hanks&#8217; immensely creepy long hair in The Davinci Code.  What a miserable train wreck of a movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clark</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2008/08/18/tom-hanks-or-harrison-ford/#comment-20819</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 23:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kulturblog.com/?p=1708#comment-20819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hanks really improved as an actor.  I think he was quite good and certainly deserved all those academy awards and nominations.  Ford did, I think, deserve the nomination for Witness.  I thought his acting was pretty good in Mosquito Coast and Frantic as well.  I do agree that by the 90&#039;s he was calling it in more even in action films I otherwise enjoyed.  He had a standard repertoire he kept going to.  On the other hand that&#039;s true of Jack Nicolson as well.  Although Nicolson obviously had way more range than Ford.

I don&#039;t understand why, after that period in the late 80&#039;s, Ford stopped pushing himself as an actor.  

Hanks was kind of a one note actor until Philadelphia although there were hints of his abilities in Sleepless in Seattle (of all films).  Gump was, I feel, a very underappreciated performance.  Even if you don&#039;t like the film one hopes you can appreciate the skill Hank brought to the roll which really demanded a lot of subtlty.

BTW - greatest Hank quote is from A League of Our Own.  (A film I didn&#039;t really like).  &quot;There&#039;s No Crying in Baseball!&quot;  Admittedly done in that overused style he used until the mid-90&#039;s of shouting in this whiney voice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hanks really improved as an actor.  I think he was quite good and certainly deserved all those academy awards and nominations.  Ford did, I think, deserve the nomination for Witness.  I thought his acting was pretty good in Mosquito Coast and Frantic as well.  I do agree that by the 90&#8242;s he was calling it in more even in action films I otherwise enjoyed.  He had a standard repertoire he kept going to.  On the other hand that&#8217;s true of Jack Nicolson as well.  Although Nicolson obviously had way more range than Ford.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t understand why, after that period in the late 80&#8242;s, Ford stopped pushing himself as an actor.  </p>
<p>Hanks was kind of a one note actor until Philadelphia although there were hints of his abilities in Sleepless in Seattle (of all films).  Gump was, I feel, a very underappreciated performance.  Even if you don&#8217;t like the film one hopes you can appreciate the skill Hank brought to the roll which really demanded a lot of subtlty.</p>
<p>BTW &#8211; greatest Hank quote is from A League of Our Own.  (A film I didn&#8217;t really like).  &#8220;There&#8217;s No Crying in Baseball!&#8221;  Admittedly done in that overused style he used until the mid-90&#8242;s of shouting in this whiney voice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian V</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2008/08/18/tom-hanks-or-harrison-ford/#comment-20818</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian V]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 23:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kulturblog.com/?p=1708#comment-20818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t really like either, but I have to go with Hanks because of Bachelor Party and The Money Pit. Ford&#039;s unquestionably got a better filmography (American Graffiti, The Conversation, Indiana Jones, Blade Runner), but I don&#039;t really think he&#039;s all that great of an actor. With the exception of Indiana Jones, I wouldn&#039;t really say any of the great items in his filmography are great because of him.

(No, I didn&#039;t forget Star Wars - I don&#039;t like those movies, sorry).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t really like either, but I have to go with Hanks because of Bachelor Party and The Money Pit. Ford&#8217;s unquestionably got a better filmography (American Graffiti, The Conversation, Indiana Jones, Blade Runner), but I don&#8217;t really think he&#8217;s all that great of an actor. With the exception of Indiana Jones, I wouldn&#8217;t really say any of the great items in his filmography are great because of him.</p>
<p>(No, I didn&#8217;t forget Star Wars &#8211; I don&#8217;t like those movies, sorry).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abby</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2008/08/18/tom-hanks-or-harrison-ford/#comment-20817</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abby]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 23:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kulturblog.com/?p=1708#comment-20817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clark, so I guess Sir Connery isn&#039;t any better than Ford - in terms of their personal life.   So, going strictly off of their films, I&#039;ll change my vote to Ford.  (Based off his early roles.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clark, so I guess Sir Connery isn&#8217;t any better than Ford &#8211; in terms of their personal life.   So, going strictly off of their films, I&#8217;ll change my vote to Ford.  (Based off his early roles.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2008/08/18/tom-hanks-or-harrison-ford/#comment-20816</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 23:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kulturblog.com/?p=1708#comment-20816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Harrison Ford wins, IMO. Han Solo &amp; Indiana Jones are far more classic than any of Hanks&#039; roles -- though I do enjoy a lot of his work -- especially &quot;Woody&quot; from &quot;Toy Story.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harrison Ford wins, IMO. Han Solo &amp; Indiana Jones are far more classic than any of Hanks&#8217; roles &#8212; though I do enjoy a lot of his work &#8212; especially &#8220;Woody&#8221; from &#8220;Toy Story.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

