Amoxicillin….

That didn’t sound very kid friendly to me. I’m guessing it got cut, then.

It was funny in its funny parts, but the best part of the movie was the exploration of Hancock’s role/purpose. It was touching to see him humble himself. Why? Because one man finally decided to show appreciation to him. He had been alone, a frankenstein’s monster. That was very touching. In a summer-movie sort of way it was balanced just right. The scene where Hancock leaves prison, then goes back in, was also touching. The care and concern of one man cause Hancock to begin appreciating himself, and trust others. The ‘good job’ to the officers was equally poignant.

Then the middle came and was just poorly introduced and awkward. The end went well, though, wrapping up the whole idea with Hancock embracing the aloneness of his role.

Not a new story, and it needed more time, betting handling, and better balance between funny and serious; thus the bad reviews, but it was still entertaining and touching. I think bad parts can be overlooked as long as the movie still does something for you. You’ll just have to go see it.

It wasn’t the disaster that Wild Wild West was, but it wasn’t anywhere near the best Will Smith movie. I’m just glad we only paid matinee prices for it.

So the great Will Smith finally, after all these years, failed to impress. I must say that if Hancock is the worst he’s done lately, then he’s doing alright. By my count, I haven’t disliked him since Wild Wild West. He’s usually top notch and among my favorite actors. Oh well. He’ll do great next time (what’s he got on his plate, BTW?).