<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kindles, iPhones, and AppleTVs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kulturblog.com/2008/03/23/kindles-iphones-and-appletvs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kulturblog.com/2008/03/23/kindles-iphones-and-appletvs/</link>
	<description>A pop culture blog by Mormons but not about Mormonism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 14:16:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kulturblog &#187; Apple TV: So I Finally Did It</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2008/03/23/kindles-iphones-and-appletvs/#comment-36460</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kulturblog &#187; Apple TV: So I Finally Did It]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 05:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kulturblog.com/2008/03/kindles-iphones-and-appletvs/#comment-36460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] unicode for the Apple system since it doesn&#8217;t always display right on Windows) Most recently here. There were always things I liked about it - especially relative to kids. But also things I [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] unicode for the Apple system since it doesn&#8217;t always display right on Windows) Most recently here. There were always things I liked about it &#8211; especially relative to kids. But also things I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a random John</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2008/03/23/kindles-iphones-and-appletvs/#comment-36459</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[a random John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kulturblog.com/2008/03/kindles-iphones-and-appletvs/#comment-36459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem that I&#039;ve seen with e-Ink is that it does not completely reset.  You can see a ghost of the previous page.  This is very distracting to me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem that I&#8217;ve seen with e-Ink is that it does not completely reset.  You can see a ghost of the previous page.  This is very distracting to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clark</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2008/03/23/kindles-iphones-and-appletvs/#comment-36458</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 03:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kulturblog.com/2008/03/kindles-iphones-and-appletvs/#comment-36458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven&#039;t played with a Kindle but I did play with the Sony eBook readers which uses the same screen.  It is very readable but also annoying.  (No anti-aliasing, for insance)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t played with a Kindle but I did play with the Sony eBook readers which uses the same screen.  It is very readable but also annoying.  (No anti-aliasing, for insance)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryce I</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2008/03/23/kindles-iphones-and-appletvs/#comment-36457</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryce I]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 03:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kulturblog.com/2008/03/kindles-iphones-and-appletvs/#comment-36457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We bought a Kindle at work (I have a cool job -- want a Wii?  Sure, we can buy that.  I don&#039;t rate an iPhone, although others in my group do.)  The interface is awful.  The form factor is almost right, but off just enough that it&#039;s annoying.  The page blinks while &quot;turning&quot; (an artifact of the e-Ink technology -- all of the pixels have to be reset apparently).  Page turns are fast, but not quite fast enough.

And yet, for all of its flaws, you can see how this is a compelling product.  You can download content over their wireless network anywhere you can get a signal, which likely means at the beach, in the airport, at the doctor&#039;s office, almost anywhere.  The catalog is surprisingly deep.  The screen resolution is more than adequate, and the e-ink screen is surprisingly readable -- a much nicer experience than reading a backlit screen. If I traveled a lot for business, I&#039;d definitely buy one for myself.  You can load your own content onto it as well, so anything you can get from gutenberg.org is usable.

Reading on an iPhone seems possible, but only for light reading.  I have my scriptures loaded on my Sansa e200 mp3 player, thanks to Rockbox.  It&#039;s great for reading a few minutes at a time, but the Kindle is a different experience entirely.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We bought a Kindle at work (I have a cool job &#8212; want a Wii?  Sure, we can buy that.  I don&#8217;t rate an iPhone, although others in my group do.)  The interface is awful.  The form factor is almost right, but off just enough that it&#8217;s annoying.  The page blinks while &#8220;turning&#8221; (an artifact of the e-Ink technology &#8212; all of the pixels have to be reset apparently).  Page turns are fast, but not quite fast enough.</p>
<p>And yet, for all of its flaws, you can see how this is a compelling product.  You can download content over their wireless network anywhere you can get a signal, which likely means at the beach, in the airport, at the doctor&#8217;s office, almost anywhere.  The catalog is surprisingly deep.  The screen resolution is more than adequate, and the e-ink screen is surprisingly readable &#8212; a much nicer experience than reading a backlit screen. If I traveled a lot for business, I&#8217;d definitely buy one for myself.  You can load your own content onto it as well, so anything you can get from gutenberg.org is usable.</p>
<p>Reading on an iPhone seems possible, but only for light reading.  I have my scriptures loaded on my Sansa e200 mp3 player, thanks to Rockbox.  It&#8217;s great for reading a few minutes at a time, but the Kindle is a different experience entirely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clark</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2008/03/23/kindles-iphones-and-appletvs/#comment-36456</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kulturblog.com/2008/03/kindles-iphones-and-appletvs/#comment-36456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BTW - anyone thinking of getting a Kindle might wish to check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ebookmall.com/ebook-categories.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this collection of eBooks&lt;/a&gt;.  Not as extensive as Amazon&#039;s offerings but a surprising number of books that you could just as easily read on an iPhone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW &#8211; anyone thinking of getting a Kindle might wish to check out <a href="http://www.ebookmall.com/ebook-categories.htm" rel="nofollow">this collection of eBooks</a>.  Not as extensive as Amazon&#8217;s offerings but a surprising number of books that you could just as easily read on an iPhone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clark</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2008/03/23/kindles-iphones-and-appletvs/#comment-36455</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 02:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kulturblog.com/2008/03/kindles-iphones-and-appletvs/#comment-36455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So is there no one with a Kindle?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So is there no one with a Kindle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clark</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2008/03/23/kindles-iphones-and-appletvs/#comment-36454</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 02:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kulturblog.com/2008/03/kindles-iphones-and-appletvs/#comment-36454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greg, the reason cut and paste is a big thing is that I might open up a spreadsheet in Google Office or some other such thing and want to paste into an email a selection from it.  Or else I&#039;m looking up some piece of equipment I want to order and need confirmation from someone else via email.  These are all things I do pretty regularly.  It&#039;s those business type workflows that I&#039;d really want the iPhone to be able to do.

Mike, regarding Dish, the non-Zoom networks (i.e. DiscoveryHD and others) definitely aren&#039;t as good as the big four (NBC, ABC, CBS, Fox)  However I don&#039;t see any difference between my local CBS via the satellite and via over the air.  There seems to be no additional compression that I can see.

My big complaint is that I watch Discovery Channels &lt;i&gt;a lot&lt;/i&gt; and they are compressed to hell.  It&#039;s very jarring.

My second complaint is that the local ABC affiliate doesn&#039;t broadcast in HD and Dish won&#039;t let me receive ABC from some other state.  It&#039;s pretty annoying everytime Lost comes on and I&#039;m seeing a 4:3 SD picture.

Mike, most 1080i sets can also do 720p.  Although there aren&#039;t really a whole lot of 1080i sets out there.  With 1080i you will see a lot of flickering artifacts which is annoying.  Most 1080p sets will convert fairly well 1080i to 1080p.  (i.e. de-interlace)  The only place I see interlacing artifacts is with DVDs.  (Especially animated Disney films)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg, the reason cut and paste is a big thing is that I might open up a spreadsheet in Google Office or some other such thing and want to paste into an email a selection from it.  Or else I&#8217;m looking up some piece of equipment I want to order and need confirmation from someone else via email.  These are all things I do pretty regularly.  It&#8217;s those business type workflows that I&#8217;d really want the iPhone to be able to do.</p>
<p>Mike, regarding Dish, the non-Zoom networks (i.e. DiscoveryHD and others) definitely aren&#8217;t as good as the big four (NBC, ABC, CBS, Fox)  However I don&#8217;t see any difference between my local CBS via the satellite and via over the air.  There seems to be no additional compression that I can see.</p>
<p>My big complaint is that I watch Discovery Channels <i>a lot</i> and they are compressed to hell.  It&#8217;s very jarring.</p>
<p>My second complaint is that the local ABC affiliate doesn&#8217;t broadcast in HD and Dish won&#8217;t let me receive ABC from some other state.  It&#8217;s pretty annoying everytime Lost comes on and I&#8217;m seeing a 4:3 SD picture.</p>
<p>Mike, most 1080i sets can also do 720p.  Although there aren&#8217;t really a whole lot of 1080i sets out there.  With 1080i you will see a lot of flickering artifacts which is annoying.  Most 1080p sets will convert fairly well 1080i to 1080p.  (i.e. de-interlace)  The only place I see interlacing artifacts is with DVDs.  (Especially animated Disney films)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike d.</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2008/03/23/kindles-iphones-and-appletvs/#comment-36453</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mike d.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 01:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kulturblog.com/2008/03/kindles-iphones-and-appletvs/#comment-36453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[in regards to hd-lite, i currently have hd programming from dishnetwork, and although i think the quality is acceptable, it definitely is not as good as OTA HDTV.  i think it&#039;s largely a bandwidth issue, and so with the available bandwidth they either could offer higher quality and less channels, or lower quality and more channels.  i&#039;m personally okay w/ a larger variety of HD programming.

as for 1080p vs 720p, i think you won&#039;t notice the difference on anything smaller than 42&quot;.  but if you&#039;re going for a bigger tv then why not?  prices are dropping so fast.  right now you can actually buy a 47&quot; 1080p toshiba from costco.com for $1299.  but it&#039;s definitely not a big enough deal to throw out your 2 year old 720p.

and i don&#039;t think there&#039;s actually such a thing as a 720p/1080i tv.  if your native resolution for horizontal lines is 720 or 768 the 1080i signal would be downgraded to 720p.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in regards to hd-lite, i currently have hd programming from dishnetwork, and although i think the quality is acceptable, it definitely is not as good as OTA HDTV.  i think it&#8217;s largely a bandwidth issue, and so with the available bandwidth they either could offer higher quality and less channels, or lower quality and more channels.  i&#8217;m personally okay w/ a larger variety of HD programming.</p>
<p>as for 1080p vs 720p, i think you won&#8217;t notice the difference on anything smaller than 42&#8243;.  but if you&#8217;re going for a bigger tv then why not?  prices are dropping so fast.  right now you can actually buy a 47&#8243; 1080p toshiba from costco.com for $1299.  but it&#8217;s definitely not a big enough deal to throw out your 2 year old 720p.</p>
<p>and i don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s actually such a thing as a 720p/1080i tv.  if your native resolution for horizontal lines is 720 or 768 the 1080i signal would be downgraded to 720p.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BTD Greg</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2008/03/23/kindles-iphones-and-appletvs/#comment-36452</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BTD Greg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 21:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kulturblog.com/2008/03/kindles-iphones-and-appletvs/#comment-36452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[arJ,

I have no opinion about that.  Most 720P seem to actually be 1024x768 (which, as I understand it, means fewer vertical lines, but more horizontal lines, right?).  Seems to be an accepted practice, though I&#039;m ready to be persuaded if there is some sort of controversy about this.

(In the interest of full disclosure, I did recently buy a 42&quot; Panasonic 720p/1080i TV with the understanding that 1080p wouldn&#039;t really make a difference.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>arJ,</p>
<p>I have no opinion about that.  Most 720P seem to actually be 1024&#215;768 (which, as I understand it, means fewer vertical lines, but more horizontal lines, right?).  Seems to be an accepted practice, though I&#8217;m ready to be persuaded if there is some sort of controversy about this.</p>
<p>(In the interest of full disclosure, I did recently buy a 42&#8243; Panasonic 720p/1080i TV with the understanding that 1080p wouldn&#8217;t really make a difference.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a random John</title>
		<link>http://kulturblog.com/2008/03/23/kindles-iphones-and-appletvs/#comment-36451</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[a random John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 21:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kulturblog.com/2008/03/kindles-iphones-and-appletvs/#comment-36451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BTD Greg,

And what are we to feel about TV makers that have been selling panels at 720p that are in fact 1024x768 rather than 1280x720?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTD Greg,</p>
<p>And what are we to feel about TV makers that have been selling panels at 720p that are in fact 1024&#215;768 rather than 1280&#215;720?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

